Skip to main content

139. Word Break

mediumAsked at Juniper Networks

Determine whether a string can be segmented into words from a dictionary using dynamic programming. Juniper asks this in software roles because tokenizing CLI command strings and configuration keywords against a known vocabulary — exactly the problem Junos CLI parsing faces — maps directly to this DP structure.

By Sam K., Founder, InterviewChamp.AI · Last verified

Source citations

Public interview reports confirming this problem appears in Juniper Networks loops.

  • Glassdoor (2025-Q3)Reported in Juniper SWE onsite reports as a DP string problem appearing in software and platform interviews.
  • Blind (2025-09)Listed in Juniper interview prep threads as a medium DP problem with clear CLI parsing analogies.

Problem

Given a string s and a dictionary of strings wordDict, return true if s can be segmented into a space-separated sequence of one or more dictionary words. Note that the same word in the dictionary may be reused multiple times in the segmentation.

Constraints

  • 1 <= s.length <= 300
  • 1 <= wordDict.length <= 1000
  • 1 <= wordDict[i].length <= 20
  • s and wordDict[i] consist of only lowercase English letters.
  • All the strings of wordDict are unique.

Examples

Example 1

Input
s = "leetcode", wordDict = ["leet","code"]
Output
true

Explanation: "leetcode" can be segmented as "leet code".

Example 2

Input
s = "applepenapple", wordDict = ["apple","pen"]
Output
true

Explanation: "apple pen apple" — apple is reused.

Example 3

Input
s = "catsandog", wordDict = ["cats","dog","sand","and","cat"]
Output
false

Explanation: No valid segmentation exists.

Approaches

1. Bottom-up DP

dp[i] = true if s[0..i-1] can be segmented. For each position i, check all substrings s[j..i-1]: if dp[j] is true and s[j..i-1] is in the word set, then dp[i] = true.

Time
O(n² * m) where n = s.length and m = avg word length
Space
O(n)
function wordBreak(s, wordDict) {
  const wordSet = new Set(wordDict);
  const dp = new Array(s.length + 1).fill(false);
  dp[0] = true; // empty prefix is always segmentable
  for (let i = 1; i <= s.length; i++) {
    for (let j = 0; j < i; j++) {
      if (dp[j] && wordSet.has(s.slice(j, i))) {
        dp[i] = true;
        break;
      }
    }
  }
  return dp[s.length];
}

Tradeoff: O(n²) time ignoring string hashing, O(n) space. The Set lookup makes the word check O(m) but is effectively O(1) for typical dictionary sizes. This is the canonical DP solution.

Juniper Networks-specific tips

State the DP invariant explicitly before coding: 'dp[i] is true if the prefix s[0..i-1] can be segmented using dictionary words.' This kind of precise subproblem definition signals that you think in DP idioms. Juniper interviewers will ask about the time complexity — distinguish the O(n²) loop cost from the Set lookup cost. Also mention converting wordDict to a Set upfront (O(1) lookup vs O(len) linear scan per word).

Common mistakes

  • Not seeding dp[0] = true — the empty prefix is always valid, and it seeds the DP correctly.
  • Not converting wordDict to a Set — O(k) lookup per check instead of O(1).
  • Using s.includes() or indexOf() instead of the dp array — these O(n²) scans don't memoize subproblem results.
  • Off-by-one in slice indices — s.slice(j, i) extracts characters at positions j through i-1.

Follow-up questions

An interviewer at Juniper Networks may pivot to one of these next:

  • Word Break II (LC 140) — return all valid segmentations, not just whether one exists.
  • How would you extend this to handle fuzzy matching (dictionary words that are close but not exact)?
  • How does this relate to CYK parsing in formal language theory?

Solve it now

Free. No sign-up. Python and JavaScript run instantly in your browser.

Output

Press Run or Cmd+Enter to execute

FAQ

Why initialize dp[0] = true?

It represents the empty string, which is trivially segmentable. Without it, no transition can be seeded and all dp values stay false.

What is the time complexity?

O(n²) for the double loop, with each slice and Set lookup taking O(m) where m is the word length. In practice, m is small (bounded by 20), making it effectively O(n²).

Can the same word be reused?

Yes — the problem explicitly allows it. The DP handles reuse naturally because dp[j] can be set from any prior position, and the same dictionary word can be matched at multiple positions.

Companies that also ask Word Break