Skip to main content

15. 3Sum

mediumAsked at Juniper Networks

Find all unique triplets that sum to zero. Juniper uses 3Sum to test whether candidates can compose sort + two-pointer cleanly and handle duplicate elimination — the same multi-pass filtering logic appears in prefix-list deduplication and routing policy intersection in network management software.

By Sam K., Founder, InterviewChamp.AI · Last verified

Source citations

Public interview reports confirming this problem appears in Juniper Networks loops.

  • Glassdoor (2026-Q1)Cited in Juniper SWE onsite reports as a classic medium-difficulty problem testing sort and two-pointer.
  • Blind (2025-12)Juniper threads list 3Sum as a go-to medium problem in technical interviews across multiple teams.

Problem

Given an integer array nums, return all the triplets [nums[i], nums[j], nums[k]] such that i != j, i != k, j != k, and nums[i] + nums[j] + nums[k] == 0. Notice that the solution set must not contain duplicate triplets.

Constraints

  • 3 <= nums.length <= 3000
  • −10^5 <= nums[i] <= 10^5

Examples

Example 1

Input
nums = [-1,0,1,2,-1,-4]
Output
[[-1,-1,2],[-1,0,1]]

Explanation: Two unique triplets sum to zero.

Example 2

Input
nums = [0,1,1]
Output
[]

Explanation: No triplet sums to zero.

Example 3

Input
nums = [0,0,0]
Output
[[0,0,0]]

Explanation: Only one unique triplet.

Approaches

1. Sort + two pointers

Sort the array. For each element nums[i], use two pointers (left = i+1, right = n-1) to find pairs that sum to -nums[i]. Skip duplicates at each level.

Time
O(n²)
Space
O(1) excluding output
function threeSum(nums) {
  nums.sort((a, b) => a - b);
  const result = [];
  for (let i = 0; i < nums.length - 2; i++) {
    if (i > 0 && nums[i] === nums[i - 1]) continue; // skip duplicate i
    let left = i + 1, right = nums.length - 1;
    while (left < right) {
      const sum = nums[i] + nums[left] + nums[right];
      if (sum === 0) {
        result.push([nums[i], nums[left], nums[right]]);
        while (left < right && nums[left] === nums[left + 1]) left++;
        while (left < right && nums[right] === nums[right - 1]) right--;
        left++; right--;
      } else if (sum < 0) {
        left++;
      } else {
        right--;
      }
    }
  }
  return result;
}

Tradeoff: O(n²) time, O(1) extra space. The canonical solution. Duplicate skipping is the subtle part — get it right at all three levels (i, left, right).

Juniper Networks-specific tips

Sorting first is the key insight — state it before writing code. The two-pointer sweep works because the sorted order lets you decide directionally whether to increase or decrease the running sum. Juniper interviewers will specifically probe the duplicate-skipping logic. Walk through nums = [-1,-1,0,1] step by step to show you handle the i-level duplicate correctly.

Common mistakes

  • Forgetting to skip duplicates at the i level (i > 0 && nums[i] === nums[i-1]) — produces duplicate triplets.
  • Skipping duplicates before pushing the result instead of after — misses the first occurrence of a valid triplet.
  • Not advancing both pointers after finding a triplet — causes an infinite loop when duplicates exist.
  • Using a Set of stringified arrays to deduplicate instead of pointer logic — correct but much slower.

Follow-up questions

An interviewer at Juniper Networks may pivot to one of these next:

  • 4Sum (LC 18) — add one more loop and reduce to 3Sum.
  • 3Sum Closest (LC 16) — find the triplet sum closest to a target.
  • How would you extend to k-Sum for arbitrary k?

Solve it now

Free. No sign-up. Python and JavaScript run instantly in your browser.

Output

Press Run or Cmd+Enter to execute

FAQ

Why sort first?

Sorting enables the two-pointer technique (move left up, right down based on sum direction) and makes duplicate detection trivial by grouping equal values together.

What does the i > 0 guard on the duplicate skip do?

It prevents skipping the very first element (i=0). Without it, we would skip nums[0] before ever processing it.

Can we do better than O(n²)?

No known general algorithm does better than O(n²) for the exact triplet enumeration problem. O(n log n) for preprocessing (sort) does not help the output phase.

Companies that also ask 3Sum