Skip to main content

15. 3Sum

mediumAsked at HP

HP enterprise analytics pipelines perform multi-dimensional range queries and constraint-satisfaction checks on device telemetry. 3Sum is the canonical multi-pointer problem — HP uses it to evaluate whether you can methodically eliminate the cubic brute force down to quadratic through sorting and pointer discipline.

By Sam K., Founder, InterviewChamp.AI · Last verified

Source citations

Public interview reports confirming this problem appears in HP loops.

  • Glassdoor (2026-Q1)HP SWE onsite reports cite 3Sum as a common second-round medium question testing sorting and two-pointer technique.
  • Blind (2025-12)HP technical interview prep threads recommend 3Sum as a must-practice medium for HP SWE roles.

Problem

Given an integer array nums, return all the triplets [nums[i], nums[j], nums[k]] such that i != j, i != k, and j != k, and nums[i] + nums[j] + nums[k] == 0. Notice that the solution set must not contain duplicate triplets.

Constraints

  • 3 <= nums.length <= 3000
  • −10^5 <= nums[i] <= 10^5

Examples

Example 1

Input
nums = [-1,0,1,2,-1,-4]
Output
[[-1,-1,2],[-1,0,1]]

Explanation: Sort the array, fix each element, and use two pointers to find pairs that sum to its negation.

Example 2

Input
nums = [0,1,1]
Output
[]

Explanation: No triplet sums to zero.

Example 3

Input
nums = [0,0,0]
Output
[[0,0,0]]

Explanation: All zeros is the only valid triplet.

Approaches

1. Sort + two pointers

Sort the array. For each index i, use two pointers (left = i+1, right = end) to find pairs that sum to -nums[i]. Skip duplicates at every step.

Time
O(n²)
Space
O(1) excluding output
function threeSum(nums) {
  nums.sort((a, b) => a - b);
  const result = [];
  for (let i = 0; i < nums.length - 2; i++) {
    if (i > 0 && nums[i] === nums[i - 1]) continue; // skip duplicate i
    let left = i + 1, right = nums.length - 1;
    while (left < right) {
      const sum = nums[i] + nums[left] + nums[right];
      if (sum === 0) {
        result.push([nums[i], nums[left], nums[right]]);
        while (left < right && nums[left] === nums[left + 1]) left++;
        while (left < right && nums[right] === nums[right - 1]) right--;
        left++;
        right--;
      } else if (sum < 0) {
        left++;
      } else {
        right--;
      }
    }
  }
  return result;
}

Tradeoff: O(n²) time after O(n log n) sort. The duplicate-skipping logic is the tricky part — handle it carefully at all three positions.

HP-specific tips

HP interviewers want you to call out the duplicate-skipping logic as a first-class concern — don't leave it as an afterthought. Walk through the [-1,0,1,2,-1,-4] example step by step showing how duplicates are skipped at the i, left, and right positions. Early termination is also a win: if nums[i] > 0, no three positive numbers can sum to zero, so you can break the outer loop.

Common mistakes

  • Using a set to de-duplicate — correct but harder to reason about; two-pointer with in-place skipping is cleaner.
  • Skipping duplicates only at i but not at left and right — produces duplicate triplets.
  • Not sorting before applying two pointers — the approach requires sorted order.
  • Using index-based instead of value-based duplicate checks — check nums[i] === nums[i-1], not i === i-1.

Follow-up questions

An interviewer at HP may pivot to one of these next:

  • 4Sum (LC 18) — add another loop and apply the same two-pointer pattern.
  • 3Sum Closest (LC 16) — find the triplet sum closest to a target.
  • How would you parallelize this across multiple CPU cores for a very large array?

Solve it now

Free. No sign-up. Python and JavaScript run instantly in your browser.

Output

Press Run or Cmd+Enter to execute

FAQ

Why sort before applying two pointers?

Sorting allows the two-pointer technique: if the sum is too small, advance left to increase it; if too large, retreat right. Without sorting, you can't make this directed decision.

How do you skip duplicate triplets at the i level?

After processing index i, skip any subsequent indices with the same value: if (i > 0 && nums[i] === nums[i-1]) continue.

Can you solve 3Sum in O(n) time?

Not with known algorithms. O(n²) is the current best. Sorting reduces the search space but does not drop below quadratic for this problem.

Companies that also ask 3Sum